This enables toggling features as best fits us in each case. With this
new approach we can then toggle :customer_balance to an entire instance,
which is what we want in France.
This makes it possible to deploy it without releasing it to users since
the toggle is not enabled for anyone.
It aims to make the balance calculation consistent across pages.
This enables showing features to individual users only, which enables us
to deploy features that are not yet released to gather feedback from
product and testing, while no users have access to it.
The logic of #includes has changed slightly in Rails 4.2 and now usually needs the #references method as well.
PG::UndefinedTable:
# ERROR: missing FROM-clause entry for table "enterprises"
# LINE 1: SELECT "spree_users".* FROM "spree_users" WHERE (enterprises...
# ^
# ./spec/models/spree/user_spec.rb:125:in `block (4 levels) in <top (required)>'
This changes how we display the description of weight, but it doesn't
change the `Spree::OptionValue`s that are being created when someone
adds a product to their cart.
This takes us closer by making the UI look more correct; but it feels
odd compared to settiong the `Spree::OptionValue` to the correct
unit on creation.
But on the other hand, that could possibly make things worse for the
shipping calculation bits.
See: https://community.openfoodnetwork.org/t/hubs-managers-can-choose-the-adapted-weight-and-measure-units-for-their-shops-given-their-own-local-situation/1289/11
We're not entirely sure what needs to be changed in order for this to
accurately work with shipping and other parts of the eCommerce platform.
We are assuming that so long as we canonically store the weight scale
in grams, that the shipping calculation will be able to do what it needs
to. So if we put in values for "oz" as grams, we may not need to do
much else in order to let product(s) be sold by the pound (or ounce).
Next steps appear to be:
- [ ] When looking at an order as a customer, do we want to show pounds
instead of grams? (See: http://localhost:3000/orders/R125684626)
- [ ] Compile a list of tests that are worth writing (because we have
no confidence that we know what we are supposed to be doing in
order for this feature to be "ready" to be used by people.)
- [ ] Write a test that demonstrates when we create a product with a
variant in pound that the product's shipping weight is correctly
calculated?
- [ ] Do we want to think about i18n?
I was looking for library files that may be used but are not loaded.
I would then add the missing `require` statements. But I found that this
module isn't used any more.
Usage removed in:
310d1b3726
