mirror of
https://github.com/openfoodfoundation/openfoodnetwork
synced 2026-01-25 20:46:48 +00:00
Stimulus controllers aren't supposed to reach outside their own element (so we can't do this with targets). Perhaps the controller should be bigger to encompass more, but I wanted to see if I could avoid making a mega component that does everything. For now it seems appropriate just to pass a selector in. Another option is to publish events on other controllers using Outlets, but I don't know if we need to go there just yet.
154 lines
6.8 KiB
JavaScript
154 lines
6.8 KiB
JavaScript
/**
|
|
* @jest-environment jsdom
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
import { Application } from "stimulus";
|
|
import bulk_form_controller from "../../../app/webpacker/controllers/bulk_form_controller";
|
|
|
|
describe("BulkFormController", () => {
|
|
beforeAll(() => {
|
|
const application = Application.start();
|
|
application.register("bulk-form", bulk_form_controller);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// Mock I18n. TODO: moved to a shared helper
|
|
beforeAll(() => {
|
|
const mockedT = jest.fn();
|
|
mockedT.mockImplementation((string, opts) => (string + ', ' + JSON.stringify(opts)));
|
|
|
|
global.I18n = {
|
|
t: mockedT
|
|
};
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
// (jest still doesn't have aroundEach https://github.com/jestjs/jest/issues/4543 )
|
|
afterAll(() => {
|
|
delete global.I18n;
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
beforeEach(() => {
|
|
document.body.innerHTML = `
|
|
<div id="disable1"></div>
|
|
<div id="disable2"></div>
|
|
<form data-controller="bulk-form" data-bulk-form-disable-selector-value="#disable1,#disable2">
|
|
<div id="actions" data-bulk-form-target="actions" class="hidden"></div>
|
|
<div id="modified_summary" data-bulk-form-target="modifiedSummary" data-translation-key="modified_summary"></div>
|
|
<div data-record-id="1">
|
|
<input id="input1a" type="text" value="initial1a">
|
|
<input id="input1b" type="text" value="initial1b">
|
|
</div>
|
|
<div data-record-id="2">
|
|
<input id="input2" type="text" value="initial2">
|
|
</div>
|
|
<input type="submit">
|
|
</form>
|
|
`;
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe("Modifying input values", () => {
|
|
// This is more of a behaviour spec. Jest doesn't have all the niceties of RSpec so lots of code
|
|
// would be repeated if these were broken into multiple examples. So it seems impractical to
|
|
// write individual unit tests.
|
|
it("counts modified fields and records", () => {
|
|
const disable1 = document.getElementById("disable1");
|
|
const disable2 = document.getElementById("disable2");
|
|
const actions = document.getElementById("actions");
|
|
const modified_summary = document.getElementById("modified_summary");
|
|
const input1a = document.getElementById("input1a");
|
|
const input1b = document.getElementById("input1b");
|
|
const input2 = document.getElementById("input2");
|
|
|
|
// Record 1: First field changed (we're not simulating a user in a browser here; we're testing DOM events directly)
|
|
input1a.value = 'updated1a';
|
|
input1a.dispatchEvent(new Event("change"));
|
|
// Expect only first field to show modified
|
|
expect(input1a.classList).toContain('modified');
|
|
expect(input1b.classList).not.toContain('modified');
|
|
expect(input2.classList).not.toContain('modified');
|
|
// Actions and modified summary are shown, with other sections disabled
|
|
expect(actions.classList).not.toContain('hidden');
|
|
expect(modified_summary.textContent).toBe('modified_summary, {"count":1}');
|
|
expect(disable1.classList).toContain('disabled-section');
|
|
expect(disable2.classList).toContain('disabled-section');
|
|
|
|
// Record 1: Second field changed
|
|
input1b.value = 'updated1b';
|
|
input1b.dispatchEvent(new Event("change"));
|
|
// Expect to show modified, and same summary translation
|
|
expect(input1a.classList).toContain('modified');
|
|
expect(input1b.classList).toContain('modified');
|
|
expect(input2.classList).not.toContain('modified');
|
|
expect(actions.classList).not.toContain('hidden');
|
|
expect(modified_summary.textContent).toBe('modified_summary, {"count":1}');
|
|
|
|
// Record 2: has been changed
|
|
input2.value = 'updated2';
|
|
input2.dispatchEvent(new Event("change"));
|
|
// Expect all fields to show modified, summary counts both records
|
|
expect(input1a.classList).toContain('modified');
|
|
expect(input1b.classList).toContain('modified');
|
|
expect(input2.classList).toContain('modified');
|
|
expect(actions.classList).not.toContain('hidden');
|
|
expect(modified_summary.textContent).toBe('modified_summary, {"count":2}');
|
|
|
|
// Record 1: Change first field back to original value
|
|
input1a.value = 'initial1a';
|
|
input1a.dispatchEvent(new Event("change"));
|
|
// Expect first field to not show modified. But both records are still modified.
|
|
expect(input1a.classList).not.toContain('modified');
|
|
expect(input1b.classList).toContain('modified');
|
|
expect(input2.classList).toContain('modified');
|
|
expect(actions.classList).not.toContain('hidden');
|
|
expect(modified_summary.textContent).toBe('modified_summary, {"count":2}');
|
|
|
|
// Record 1: Change second field back to original value
|
|
input1b.value = 'initial1b';
|
|
input1b.dispatchEvent(new Event("change"));
|
|
// Both fields for record 1 show unmodified, but second record is still modified
|
|
expect(input1a.classList).not.toContain('modified');
|
|
expect(input1b.classList).not.toContain('modified');
|
|
expect(input2.classList).toContain('modified');
|
|
expect(actions.classList).not.toContain('hidden');
|
|
expect(modified_summary.textContent).toBe('modified_summary, {"count":1}');
|
|
expect(disable1.classList).toContain('disabled-section');
|
|
expect(disable2.classList).toContain('disabled-section');
|
|
|
|
// Record 2: Change back to original value
|
|
input2.value = 'initial2';
|
|
input2.dispatchEvent(new Event("change"));
|
|
// No fields or records are modified
|
|
expect(input1a.classList).not.toContain('modified');
|
|
expect(input1b.classList).not.toContain('modified');
|
|
expect(input2.classList).not.toContain('modified');
|
|
// Actions are hidden and other sections are now re-enabled
|
|
expect(actions.classList).toContain('hidden');
|
|
expect(modified_summary.textContent).toBe('modified_summary, {"count":0}');
|
|
expect(disable1.classList).not.toContain('disabled-section');
|
|
expect(disable2.classList).not.toContain('disabled-section');
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// unable to test disconnect at this stage
|
|
// describe("disconnect()", () => {
|
|
// it("resets other elements", () => {
|
|
// const disable1 = document.getElementById("disable1");
|
|
// const disable2 = document.getElementById("disable2");
|
|
// const controller = document.querySelector('[data-controller="bulk-form"]');
|
|
// const form = document.querySelector('[data-controller="bulk-form"]');
|
|
|
|
// // Form is modified and other sections are disabled
|
|
// input1a.value = 'updated1a';
|
|
// input1a.dispatchEvent(new Event("change"));
|
|
// expect(disable1.classList).toContain('disabled-section');
|
|
// expect(disable2.classList).toContain('disabled-section');
|
|
|
|
// // form.submit(); //not implemented
|
|
// document.body.removeChild(controller); //doesn't trigger disconnect
|
|
// controller.innerHTML = ''; //doesn't trigger disconnect
|
|
|
|
// expect(disable1.classList).not.toContain('disabled-section');
|
|
// expect(disable2.classList).not.toContain('disabled-section');
|
|
// });
|
|
// });
|
|
});
|