This for new changes to the enterprise registration/signup flow where a map will be displayed when people are filling in their address. On this map people can check the geocoder has geocoded their address correctly and if not they can manually adjust their latitude/longitude on the map.
But currently every time someone changes their address in the Admin > Enterprise > Address section the address would automatically be geocoded so this could overwrite the latitude/longitude that was set during sign up. To prevent the latitude/longitude from being overwritten this add's a checkbox which people need to explicity click if they want their address to be automatically geocoded, otherwise it will just use the manually configured latitude/longitude.
Note this new feature which allows people to select their location on a map during registration only works with Google maps so far. So if an instance is using Open Street Map this change also adds support for passing a :use_geocoder parameter to the Api::EnterprisesController during registration so that the address will be geocoded on the backend without the use of a map.
Fixes:
384) Spree::OrderMailer basic behaviour doesn't aggressively escape double quotes in confirmation body
Failure/Error: adjustments = adjustments.to_a + order.shipment_adjustments.to_a
ActionView::Template::Error:
Cannot have a has_many :through association 'Spree::Order#shipment_adjustments' which goes through 'Spree::Order#shipments' before the through association is defined.
# ./app/helpers/checkout_helper.rb:10:in `checkout_adjustments_for'
# ./app/views/spree/order_mailer/_order_summary.html.haml:43:in `_app_views_spree_order_mailer__order_summary_html_haml__2911251238692323485_70331958934800'
# ./app/views/spree/order_mailer/confirm_email_for_customer.html.haml:23:in `_app_views_spree_order_mailer_confirm_email_for_customer_html_haml__3734564010704881256_70331959518520'
# ./app/mailers/spree/order_mailer.rb:35:in `block in confirm_email_for_customer'
# ./app/mailers/spree/order_mailer.rb:33:in `confirm_email_for_customer'
# ./spec/mailers/order_mailer_spec.rb:20:in `block (3 levels) in <top (required)>'
# ------------------
# --- Caused by: ---
# ActiveRecord::HasManyThroughOrderError:
# Cannot have a has_many :through association 'Spree::Order#shipment_adjustments' which goes through 'Spree::Order#shipments' before the through association is defined.
# ./app/helpers/checkout_helper.rb:10:in `checkout_adjustments_for'
Fixes:
259) Spree::ShippingMethod#shipments can gather all the related shipments
Failure/Error: expect(shipping_method.shipments).to include(shipment)
ActiveRecord::HasManyThroughOrderError:
Cannot have a has_many :through association 'Spree::ShippingMethod#shipments' which goes through 'Spree::ShippingMethod#shipping_rates' before the through association is defined.
# ./spec/models/spree/shipping_method_spec.rb:190:in `block (3 levels) in <module:Spree>'
Failure/Error: enterprise.andand.touch
ActiveRecord::ActiveRecordError:
cannot touch on a new or destroyed record object. Consider using persisted?, new_record?, or destroyed? before touching
# ./app/models/spree/address.rb:155:in `touch_enterprise'
# ./spec/factories/product_factory.rb:12:in `block (3 levels) in <top (required)>'
# ./spec/factories/variant_factory.rb:26:in `block (4 levels) in <top (required)>'
# ./spec/models/spree/variant_spec.rb:9:in `block (2 levels) in <module:Spree>'
We get the same value here, but without the three additional database hits to adjustments (both of these values are already present on the order object itself).
For some reason the order objects were stale here when calling order.update! from either a payment or shipment callback, which was overwriting those states as nil on the order.
We set this value to `true` unconditionally in an initializer, and then check the value in various places via Spree::Config. It's never false, and it's not configurable, so we can just drop it and remove the related conditionals. 🔥
This was triggering two separate updates, and each of those updates could trigger callbacks, and those could trigger other callbacks. Here we're doing the same thing, but with one update.