Remove shop-tabs controllers since we can listen on `"data-action":
"orderCycleSelected@window->tabs-and-panels#activateDefaultPanel"`
Test for cases:
* activate by clicking on tab
* activateDefaultPanel on orderCycleSelected event
* activateFromWindowLocationOrDefaultPanelTarget to activate tab based
on achor in URL
I would have like to use a standard form to submit to the reflex but the
whole enterprise settings tab is in a form already and HTML doesn't
allow nested forms. While it does still work in browsers, it would have
added much more HTML to set up a form with a hidden input field instead
of just one additional data attribute.
The whole page is rendered by the controller again but the reflex root
attribute ensures that only parts of this tab are replaced. Otherwise
unsaved data on other tabs could be replaced and the page actually
becomes blank because AngularJS doesn't play well with the morph.
It doesn't matter where the flash messages appear in the HTML (thanks to fixed positioning), so why not keep it simple and send them with the main response.
preventDefault in case we are inside a form, so the button doesn't submit it.
This ensures morphed flashes hide like other flashes (eg in bulk order actions). I wanted to write a spec to prove it, but Capybara doesn't support mocking setTimeout and I didn't want to use sleep.
I've made it optional because this controller is shared with the shop frontend ([supposedly](5ef34347a3), although angular seems to override it).
This naming scheme removes some duplication which is nice, but it's a little strange and results in a longer name overall. I don't like it very much because:
- filenames don't include the component's actual name. This makes it slightly harder to find them in my text editor (but I'd probably get used to that)
- the namespace and class naming isn't exactly right. This is _the_ vertical_ellipsis_menu, not a subcomponent.
- the stimulus controller name is now longer, adding more cruft to the HTML.
Lots of discussion here: https://github.com/ViewComponent/view_component/discussions/67
People tried to come up with a better way (and I was tempted to try myself). It seems this approach won. I guess it's not so bad if your component names are shorter.
