This naming scheme removes some duplication which is nice, but it's a little strange and results in a longer name overall. I don't like it very much because:
- filenames don't include the component's actual name. This makes it slightly harder to find them in my text editor (but I'd probably get used to that)
- the namespace and class naming isn't exactly right. This is _the_ vertical_ellipsis_menu, not a subcomponent.
- the stimulus controller name is now longer, adding more cruft to the HTML.
Lots of discussion here: https://github.com/ViewComponent/view_component/discussions/67
People tried to come up with a better way (and I was tempted to try myself). It seems this approach won. I guess it's not so bad if your component names are shorter.
Javascript hasn't been moved in, as we don't seem to be set up for that yet.
We could make it smarter, and pass in an array of parameters to build the links (as in _order_links.html.haml). But why make it complicated if we don't need to?
This can happen when there's a validation error. The field with error will also be marked changed, but the error style will override it.
I'd like to move this into a FormBuilder. Existing formbuilder gems don't seem to support it (though I didn't look very hard).
The feature toggle will determine which bulk products screen shows. An additional products_old path is also temporarily added for easy reference.
Later, when the old screen is full removed, we'll probably rename the _v3 classes to tidy up.
The form helper () doesn't work for this case, but it seems we can call it directly like this instead. I'd like to fix the helper, but got stuck this time.
Stimulus controllers aren't supposed to reach outside their own element (so we can't do this with targets). Perhaps the controller should be bigger to encompass more, but I wanted to see if I could avoid making a mega component that does everything. For now it seems appropriate just to pass a selector in.
Another option is to publish events on other controllers using Outlets, but I don't know if we need to go there just yet.
I found myself trying to write Ruby in Javascript, and it's not nearly as pretty..
Javascript now has more advanced data structures like Map, but it's rather useless because it doesn't have the usual iterator methods (such as filter, map, reduce etc).
Also for the spec I wasn't sure of the best approach, so will gladly recieve feedback.
