I saw the row were returned not respecting any ordering when refreshing
the page locally. It made it hard to debug whether or not the customer
balance was right.
It's less than ideal to use `allow_any_instance_of` but with this legacy
and very coupled code, it's the best we can do.
Increases the maximum number of digits (on the left side of the decimal place) that the column can hold, to allow larger values. This change is made in Spree 2.2 and is relevant in cases with either large order values, or certain currencies that have large values as standard. For example, 100 UK Pounds is roughly 4000 Thai Baht. 1 million pounds is unlikely to ever be needed as a value, but 1 million Baht is not so unlikely...
Before if you did a bulk product update there was an error:
> TypeError: Cannot set property 'variants' of null
It only seemed to happen if pagination was required i.e. more than 15 products. It seemed to be happening because the default sort order on the products API endpoint which handles the bulk update is 'created desc' but 'name asc' on the /admin/products controller.
Another fix included here is for the sorting direction arrows which were not displaying on the admin products page. The sorting arrows require the sorting expression to be on the :sorting var instead of :q.sorting.
Fixes#6399
This enables toggling features as best fits us in each case. With this
new approach we can then toggle :customer_balance to an entire instance,
which is what we want in France.
This removes the following annoying deprecation warnings that happen in
each test.
```
DEPRECATION WARNING: You are trying to generate the URL for a named route called :main_app but no such route was found. In the future, this will result in an `ActionController::UrlGenerationError` exception. (called from process_action_with_route at /usr/s
rc/app/spec/support/controller_requests_helper.rb:49)
DEPRECATION WARNING: Passing the `use_route` option in functional tests are deprecated. Support for this option in the `process` method (and the related `get`, `head`, `post`, `patch`, `put` and `delete` helpers) will be removed in the next version without
replacement. Functional tests are essentially unit tests for controllers and they should not require knowledge to how the application's routes are configured. Instead, you should explicitly pass the appropiate params to the `process` method. Previously th
e engines guide also contained an incorrect example that recommended using this option to test an engine's controllers within the dummy application. That recommendation was incorrect and has since been corrected. Instead, you should override the `@routes`
variable in the test case with `Foo::Engine.routes`. See the updated engines guide for details. (called from process_action_with_route at /usr/src/app/spec/support/controller_requests_helper.rb:49)
```
Closes#6727.
This avoids the authorization of all the VOs of the hub, which will go
through VOs that may have become invalid due to their underlying product
not belonging to the supplier the hub has permissions with (or any other
data integrity issue).
This is utterly confusing for the user who is only given a generic error
and doesn't understand what's wrong with the particular VO they changed,
while it may be fine after all. What's more, this often results in
a customer support request, which then may end up with a dev finding out
which VO is broken.
Also, there's no point in loading them from DB if the users didn't touch
them.
This moves a step closer to having a simple and straightforward way to
configure the app's mail delivery which doesn't require to be a nuclear
engineer to troubleshoot mail issues.
It happens way too often that servers have mail config broken when
restarted or redeployed and it takes too much brain power to fix it. No
doubt; it's way too complex.
I chose to leave this page's form fields but "Send mails as" as
read-only. This other field is still used by instance manager to
troubleshoot mail issues.
#update_column(s) skips callbacks (which is useful), but it doesn't change the updated_at field on the record by default (which we should be doing in these cases).
This change is made in Spree 2.2 here: b367c629ce
Whatever fee adjustments there are on other line items should be left alone (not recreated), and whatever fee adjustments are already on the order should just be updated.
This method is named "update distribution charge". What this method actually does is delete all of the fee adjustments on an order and all it's line items, then recreate them all from scratch. We call this from lots of different places all the time, and it's incredibly expensive. It even gets called from inside of transactions being run inside callbacks. Renaming it hopefully will add a bit of clarity.
This needs to be a lot more granular!
